Darren72 wrote:You've both misinterpreted this paper. First, it is not a new study. It is a review of the existing evidence. Second, there is nothing in the paper about "sensitivity" to salt. They key distinction is between people who are already hypertensive and those who have normal blood pressure.
The (non-political) conclusion is that cutting salt intake may be part of an overall strategy for people who are already hypertensive.
A second conclusion made by the authors is that these results (particularly for whites) are no different than what had been concluded by literature reviews done thirty years ago.
Actually, I didn't misinterpret the paper -- I was just reacting to Leek's summary of the contents. I've read so much about this debate I didn't get any farther than that -- and my comments about sensitivity were based on completely different studies (there have been a lot of them). A couple of studies actually showed that heart disease is much higher among folks with a really low salt intake.
This has been a subject of great interest and considerable study for me for many years, as my mom has high blood pressure. Even her doctor has now told her to simply use salt reasonably, because eliminating it offers no benefits and has some dangers.