Note that this birthday site also immediately backtracks from the idea that Louis' Lunch was the first hamburger... I stick to my opinion, that there may have been Hamburger steaks on buns, and there may have been men from Hamburg cooking them in Homburgs for all I know, but a hamburger that absolutely rejects the presence of mustard (as Louis' does) is still a prehistoric protoburger, not the Ur-burger. The history of the true American hamburger begins the moment someone first put the canonical combination of mustard, onion and pickle on one-- not tomato, not butter, not pickled herring or anything else.
Incidentally, I was talking to Mom of Mike G about the Highlander, the 40s/50s drive-in her father operated in Wichita KS, and expounding upon the 30s Style Hamburger being 10 or 12 to the pound, when she said "Actually a Highlander was 6 to the pound."
I said, surprised, "It was a thick burger?"
"No, it was wider, sort of like Wendy's," she said. (Probably Steak & Shake comes closer, actually.)
So it's interesting that when somebody wanted to make a bigger burger, they doubled the patties (like the Big Boy and its descendants) or they widened it (like the Highlander)-- but they didn't make a thicker patty back then, both because it would have taken longer to fry if it were thicker, and because it simply wasn't what hamburgers were like then-- they were a thin patty, no matter how big in circumference.
Last edited by
Mike G on July 29th, 2005, 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.