... I can't help wondering, do restaurateurs who themselves don't imbibe on principle (e.g., religious belief) feel a little annoyed by customers who bring alcohol into their restaurants? I know, if they say they're BYOB, officially they allow it; I'm just wondering about the subtler sensibility, not wanting to offend.
Kennyz: Most restauranteurs I've met are people. As people, they tend to have widely varying opinions about matters such as alcohol and religion.
Kman: My gut feel is that any place that advertises as being BYOB is probably also OK with being BYOB. If they aren't, though, I'm not going to spend much effort divining how it affects them . . . anymore then I would by having veal at a place that chooses to serve veal but for some reason the owner are opposed to veal (or foie gras or . . .).
... and refrain from bringing wine or beer out of respect for the devout Muslim staff and diners.
Katie wrote:A while ago, I asked this question in reference to the Kabul House:... I can't help wondering, do restaurateurs who themselves don't imbibe on principle (e.g., religious belief) feel a little annoyed by customers who bring alcohol into their restaurants? I know, if they say they're BYOB, officially they allow it; I'm just wondering about the subtler sensibility, not wanting to offend.
These were the replies:Kennyz: Most restauranteurs I've met are people. As people, they tend to have widely varying opinions about matters such as alcohol and religion.
Other than the fact that he misspelled restaurateur, Kennyz's reply made me feel foolish (surprise, surprise), and still lacking any guidance.
Katie wrote:Thanks, Khaopaat. Calling ahead is good advice.
I wonder also, is it disingenuous for a place to advertise itself as BYOB if the management would really prefer that patrons don't BTOB? And/or, are the pressures of the marketplace such that the management typically can't afford to express that preference?
A group of 10 of us went here on Saturday night. Imagining that this place was BYOB (not sure where I got that idea from, but that's beside the point) I plopped a bottle of wine on the table and my boyfriend cracked open a beer. A waiter came over, whispered something to the guy at the head of the table, and we figured that it was not okay that we brought our own. No big deal, I put away the bottle of wine and my boyfriend quickly finished his beer on the down low.
We were then treated to the most comically awful service. Like it was blatantly on purpose bad. Our group found it very entertaining waiting to see what disrespect we would next be subjected to. I won't bother going through the list, but it was seriously ridiculous and hilarious. I guess the beer and wine offended them or something. Whoops.
Anyway, the food was basically the same as the other good places on the block.
budrichard wrote:frankly if in a Muslim country where the Law specifies adherance to the Muslim religeon then its no alcohol.
I happen to live in a country (USA) where alcohol consumtion is legal and I don't feel the need to ask anyone's permission to BYOB. If the establishment clearly specifies no BYOB, that's there right and I won't patronize the establishment but I don' worry about offending anyone in my vacinity if I am consuming alcohol. I think this is carrying 'sensitivity' training to the extreme.-Dick
d4v3 wrote:Muslim owned establishments are not the only ones with bans on BYOB. For instance, Flower's Pot, a now defunct Belizean restaurant used to ban alcohol. I don't think their aversion to BYOB was motivated by religion. I think they just had bad experiences with drunken patrons. It is not uncommon to see parties abusing BYOB privileges by consuming way more booze than would normally accompany a meal. I think some places, rather than deal with those potentially explosive situations, simply ban BYOB altogether.
chgoeditor wrote:I think Kenny said it well. If I'm dining at a Muslim-owned restaurant -- whether I'm in Chicago or London or Morocco or someplace else -- and I don't know if alcohol is welcome, I'll ask before I assume.