justjoan wrote:i'm a char polish fan, and phil's version is very good-lovely snap to the skin. (though just to be confusing, the dog is 'charred' but the polish is 'grilled'; but, i'm told, they are prepared identically....). i havent tried the fries yet, but earlier this week i was driving by at breakfast time and went in for an egg sandwich with bacon (yes, doschi, they have bacon). i guess i didnt look carefully enough at the menu, because i was surprised when i bit into it, that it was missing the egg. it seems there is one breakfast sandwich with eggs (i forget which of the unappetizing names it goes under),but several without eggs. what i unintentionally ordered was bacon, cheese, chopped red and yellow peppers and no egg. i really liked the grilled, pressed bread; very much like the bread on a cubano sandwich. it wasn't bad at all, but i had to go back inside and confirm that the egg hadn't been forgotten. i thought it was a little strange, though i was assured than an egg can be added to any of the sandwiches for a buck. it never occurred to me that an egg wasn't just part of every breakfast sandwich .maybe it's just me.....anyway, a fine addition to the neighborhood. there's friendly staff and a big patio with tables shaded with umbrellas.
Then breakfast sandwiches are supposed to be modelled after Sarkis in Evanston/Wilmette. Apparently that's the way they do them up there.
justjoan wrote:Then breakfast sandwiches are supposed to be modelled after Sarkis in Evanston/Wilmette. Apparently that's the way they do them up there.
good call ziggy- i emailed phil's last stand when they first opened to find out their hours, and mentioned that i used to eat at herm's in skokie when i was a kid. phil's partner, david, replied and asked me if i used to eat at sarkis's also. i said i did, but i forgot about the breakfast sandwiches until you posted this- it's been a long time.....
Bun and sauce are evocative of In-N-Out, but the burger is grilled not griddled and does not taste like an In-N-Out burger. A good burger, just not In-N-Out.doschi wrote:The Fatso burger is apparently modeled after the In-N-Out burger, and is about the closest thing one could find in Chicagoland.
dansch wrote:Finally tried Phil's last night - chardog was good, but the fries were only ok. Maybe I should have asked for them extra crispy?
Red Hot Ranch, which has become my go-to hotdog spot, consistently cranks out better fries. While I generally prefer a chardog to a steamed one, I don't see Phil's displacing RHR for me. I'll definitely give it another go (for a char-grilled salami) - maybe I just got unlucky with an impatient fry cook.
-Dan
G Wiv wrote:Bun and sauce are evocative of In-N-Out, but the burger is grilled not griddled and does not taste like an In-N-Out burger. A good burger, just not In-N-Out.doschi wrote:The Fatso burger is apparently modeled after the In-N-Out burger, and is about the closest thing one could find in Chicagoland.
jimswside wrote:Ate outside at one of the picnic tables and really enjoyed our visit, double fatso was great, one of my favorite burgers of recent memory. Juicy, popping with flavor and loaded with onions.
Great spot.
jimswside wrote:Question for the regulars. Are the shrimp used for the po boy and the fried shrimp different. Reason I ask is I have received obviously different shrimp on two visits. First visit, plump juicy shrimps. This visit, butterflied(flattened pucks) and a little rubbery..
Funk Dracula wrote: If I feel like shrimp, it's either north up Western to Red Hot, or head east down Division to Goose Island.
B
Funk Dracula wrote:
Now what would make Phil's an even better place, is if they would figure out how to offer milkshakes. As it stands for me, Phil's Last Stand followed by a trip up to Margies makes for a nice one-two punch; but if I could have a real milkshake right there to accompany those most excellent burgers and fries.... oh boy.
-B