eatchicago wrote:My little brother and I went on a North-Side nostalgia rib tour a few years ago and we both were disappointed to find that we really disliked the whole Carson's rib experience--except for those potatoes.
stevez wrote:...the chopped liver in the bar was a pretty good forespice.
grandmai wrote:Carson's will be missed. At one time the North side of Chicago had numerous places that served ribs that were the same style as Carson's (I don't like "fall off the bone" meat on my baby back ribs) Sally's, Miller's, the Black Angus come to mind immediately (showing my age huh?). But they were the only ones left in the city. Guess I'm reduced to cooking my own. Does anyone have a spot for "chewy" ribs in Chicago proper? I know about Nightengale's in Highwood...
sabersix wrote:I do not think I ever had the ribs at Carsons, cuz I would have their pork chops. Thick and cooked the way I like them, rare. Paired with the potatos, a great meal.
Paul SL wrote:Haven't seen a post about it here, but when I drove by yesterday, I noticed the Carson's Ribs at Clark and Ridge is gone. Hadn't been there since it was the Town and Country. (Wow, am I OLD!!)
The long-vacant Carson’s, The Place For Ribs, parcel at 5970 N. Ridge Avenue officially has a tenant. Starbucks has a signed a lease for a new coffee shop.
Dave148 wrote:Paul SL wrote:Haven't seen a post about it here, but when I drove by yesterday, I noticed the Carson's Ribs at Clark and Ridge is gone. Hadn't been there since it was the Town and Country. (Wow, am I OLD!!)The long-vacant Carson’s, The Place For Ribs, parcel at 5970 N. Ridge Avenue officially has a tenant. Starbucks has a signed a lease for a new coffee shop.
https://chicago.eater.com/2017/12/20/16 ... ood-report
Oh? How would you react if it was announced to be a Portillo's, or Giordano's location?EvA wrote: I'm glad something is going in there--I drive by there often--but does it have to be another Starbucks?