David Hammond wrote:Matt, I am in awe.
Gypsy Boy wrote:Um, don't want to be a spoilsport, but I checked the first ten links. With the possible exception of the fourth, I don't believe that there are any truncated posts in them.
Gypsy Boy wrote:Am I not understanding something?
milz50 wrote:Gypsy Boy wrote:Um, don't want to be a spoilsport, but I checked the first ten links. With the possible exception of the fourth, I don't believe that there are any truncated posts in them.
I went back and checked the first several links manually and found truncated posts in the following:
http://www.lthforum.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=565 (Rene's post)
http://www.lthforum.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=566 (You mentioned this one already)
http://www.lthforum.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=570 (First post)
http://www.lthforum.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=575 pg 1 (Cathy's post re: lump charcoal time 7:30 - )
http://www.lthforum.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=575&start=30 pg 2 (Cathy's post re: lump charcoal time 7:30 - )
Pie Lady wrote:If there's pie involved, sign me up.
Pie Lady wrote:Does that make me group 1?
Cathy2 wrote:
You are done with any thread once you read a post older than March 17, 2005.
Thanks!
Pie Lady wrote:Perhaps this is a stupid question, but my first link took me to a thread with one post. Should I assume this is it and not report anything, or should I assume there were responses that were deleted?
fropones wrote:In going over a few of these I've noticed that there will be a good amount of false positives due to the diacritical a in the word Doppeltgänger in Antonius's signature. If you have one with no broken posts this could be why.