[quote][quote="riddlemay"][quote=quote]Comparison shopping ads have been around for decades. Even a slightly-intelligent consumer knows that most stores have periodic (usually weekly) sales, and any comparisons they make should be done based on sales flyers from the same time period.[/quote]
I don't know...just extrapolating from me, I was fooled. (I said so in a different thread when I first saw the ad.) I'm not a coupon kind of guy, and I'm not price-sensitive when it comes to groceries in general, so I am on the dumb side when it comes to this.[/quote]
Since you're not price-sensitive when it comes to groceries, you're not exactly the target for such an ad. So extrapolating from your experience would be a dangerous proposition.

[/quote]
I mostly agree with that. Yet their big newspaper ad made an impact on me. To the extent it's relevant, I was like: "I'm not price-sensitive, but on the other hand I don't believe in wasting money. If all other things were equal (convenience of location, extensiveness of selection, the shopping experience, etc.), I'd be a fool not to go to the Walmart across the street from the Jewel instead of to the Jewel." All Walmart really had to accomplish with that ad was to put itself on grocery shoppers' radar...and I think they probably did.
Maybe some definition of terms is in order. For myself, "not price sensitive" doesn't mean "completely immune to considerations of price." It means other factors that are important to me might outweigh price. (For instance, I might sometimes buy a book at an independent bookseller instead of Amazon because I want to support the independent bookseller.) However, when the playing field is absolutely level, presenting no other factors of personal importance to consider, I will choose lower price. (How could anyone not, in that scenario?) If there is a significant cohort of others like me out there, the Walmart ad reached them.