ronnie_suburban wrote:According to those quoted in the article, it's not that the name's offensive, it's that the name "glamorizes criminal culture." This is highlighted when one compares FF's to Curt's Cafe, which has a similar mission but fulfills it without all the self-referencial schtick. I can see the merits of the argument but admit that it's an argument that requires a fair amount of humorlessness.
The key word there is schtick, Ronnie. To me, at the end of the day, that's all it is. Words and playful concepts are meant to not be taken seriously, IMO. The man is just trying to run a business in a way that truly pleases him and there should be nothing wrong with that because tons of other restaurant owners and other business owners do that every single day.
Still, to all reading, how would you feel if FF's opened near your home? Would it irk you knowing that ex-convicts were working nearby at a place that made light of its mission? Would you feel comfortable with your kids regularly being around the employees? I could, as a prospective neighbor, see wanting a little more seriousness from such a venture but I get the feeling that the griping over the nomenclature is mainly a pretext put forth by folks who'd be against it, regardless. I think it's a classic NIMBY situation.
=R=
Personally, i would have no problem with it. I already live on a main street so nothing really phases me or my husband who's lived on the same block for over twenty years where he raised his daughter and seen the neighborhood go through changes from gang bang city to hipster socialites for lack of better terms. I feel like I live in a hot dog desert anyway so if it means I could walk down the street to get to it versus driving to another neighborhood, all the better.