Royal Lichter wrote:Rarely do I post disappointments with restaurants, much less burger places, but I have to say that I was disappointed in Umami Burger Chicago in Wicker Park. The restaurant itself was nice, and has an open feel that isn't cramped. The staff is helpful, friendly, and attentive.
I found the burger however to be fairly subpar.
Max wrote:Royal Lichter wrote:Rarely do I post disappointments with restaurants, much less burger places, but I have to say that I was disappointed in Umami Burger Chicago in Wicker Park. The restaurant itself was nice, and has an open feel that isn't cramped. The staff is helpful, friendly, and attentive.
I found the burger however to be fairly subpar.
I haven't been to the location here, but I've been to the locations around LA before and I never really understood the appeal of the burgers. Friends out West have raved about the food, but I've always felt I was missing something.
spinynorman99 wrote:After living in the area for over a year I stopped into Blaze-N-Grill for the first time this weekend. While I don't know if it's the best, it's certainly in the running (top 10; maybe top 5-6)and cannot be beaten for value (came cooked as ordered (nice and pink inside) on what I believe is a Rosen's brioche bun, with minimal toppings. Terrific flavor to the burger itself. Great fries, also.
BR wrote:Having heard so many good things about the Big Jones burger, I ordered it the other night. No pimiento, but the farm fresh ingredients they were using (lettuce, onions, etc.) were really fantastic, as was the sauce that I can't remember too well right now (not quite a Bernaise, though I believe it might have had tarragon).
Unfortunately, the burger itself was a letdown. Cooked medium rare as requested, but not even a hint of juice and too densely packed. One problem I have with so many places these days is their use of grass fed beef and their unwillingness to introduce more fat into the meat. 25% fat please! If I wanted to go on a diet, trust me, I wouldn't be ordering the burger. Fat is flavor, and this burger just did not deliver on the flavor.
BR wrote:Having heard so many good things about the Big Jones burger, I ordered it the other night. No pimiento, but the farm fresh ingredients they were using (lettuce, onions, etc.) were really fantastic, as was the sauce that I can't remember too well right now (not quite a Bernaise, though I believe it might have had tarragon).
Unfortunately, the burger itself was a letdown. Cooked medium rare as requested, but not even a hint of juice and too densely packed. One problem I have with so many places these days is their use of grass fed beef and their unwillingness to introduce more fat into the meat. 25% fat please! If I wanted to go on a diet, trust me, I wouldn't be ordering the burger. Fat is flavor, and this burger just did not deliver on the flavor.
gnarchief wrote:BR wrote:Having heard so many good things about the Big Jones burger, I ordered it the other night. No pimiento, but the farm fresh ingredients they were using (lettuce, onions, etc.) were really fantastic, as was the sauce that I can't remember too well right now (not quite a Bernaise, though I believe it might have had tarragon).
Unfortunately, the burger itself was a letdown. Cooked medium rare as requested, but not even a hint of juice and too densely packed. One problem I have with so many places these days is their use of grass fed beef and their unwillingness to introduce more fat into the meat. 25% fat please! If I wanted to go on a diet, trust me, I wouldn't be ordering the burger. Fat is flavor, and this burger just did not deliver on the flavor.
I always find it amusing to see people paying an upcharge for grass fed beef burgers and then raving about the difference it makes when all they are tasting is a buzzword.
fatty as 70:30 or possibly even more, though I don't know off-hand if anyone offers them that rich.
boudreaulicious wrote:First up--we ordered the burger at BR's insistence--as our appetizer. Cut in quarters and then cut the last quarter in thirds. YES it was worth fighting over. Terrific beef topped with a mixture of aged cheddar & butterkase, smoked chili ketchup, aioli, and pickles on a house made bun. Sounds like a lot but the cheese was like a spread-not thick or clumpy--and the ketchup and aioli were sparingly applied as well. Add very thinly shredded pickles and you had a perfectly balanced burger with the beef as king. Woke up thinking about that burger and that's not usually my thing.
BR wrote:And it really is a fantastic burger. I tend to be a "less is more" type guy when it comes to burgers but I agree that the beef flavor was front and center here and I loved it.
mbh wrote:Lord, that burger! I'm well know among my friends for disliking excess on burgers to the point of often not liking cheese, but this one stole my heart. The restraint shown with the toppings and the quality of the beef made it one of the best burgers I've had recently.
Royal Lichter wrote:I believe that White Oak Tavern's burger by Chef John Asbaty is one of the best in the City of Chicago. I'm really a fan of this one. It is so well balanced; it has everything. Two cheeses (butterkase, cheddar), smoked chili ketchup, and pickles. And it's not too cool to have a little ketchup on it, too! It is really classic and also very chef-y all in one, and it is not an umami-bomb like the Au Cheval burger is.


I didn't post at the time but I met two friends for dinner at Rub back in the summer. BBQ was the name of the game that evening but, remembering this thread, I suggested we split a burger as an appetizer. Not taking anything away from the great pork and brisket(!), I think I'm getting a burger next visit.rubbbqco wrote:We loosely pack the burgers, and griddle-cook them crispy. Don't ask for it rare - this burger is too fatty for that. We cook it through, and it retains its juicy/fatty deliciousness. It's served topped with aged cheddar, smoked vidalia onions, house-made pickles & S. Carolina Mustard sauce.
Try it, let me know what you think.
jay2021 wrote:Time Out Chicago just came out with it's latest best burgers list http://www.timeout.com/chicago/restaura ... -and-fries
jay2021 wrote:The article was posted January 8, 2016
The dates in the comments sections were from articles previously written about these establishments.
This is Time Out Chicago's most recent list of Chicago's best burgers.
Roger Ramjet wrote:jay2021 wrote:The article was posted January 8, 2016
The dates in the comments sections were from articles previously written about these establishments.
This is Time Out Chicago's most recent list of Chicago's best burgers.
And if that's not stupid I must not know what the word means.
Gotta love that they reprinted three separate posts asking why Au Cheval isn't listed.
Note that this is a list of Best Burgers At Burger Joints. Which is why Au Cheval isn't listed, in case you were thinking of asking.
Drover wrote:Roger Ramjet wrote:jay2021 wrote:The article was posted January 8, 2016
The dates in the comments sections were from articles previously written about these establishments.
This is Time Out Chicago's most recent list of Chicago's best burgers.
And if that's not stupid I must not know what the word means.
Gotta love that they reprinted three separate posts asking why Au Cheval isn't listed.
Note that this is a list of Best Burgers At Burger Joints. Which is why Au Cheval isn't listed, in case you were thinking of asking.
Not to mention Small Cheval is listed this time around.
cilantro wrote:I know, I know, making fun of "Best of" lists is shooting fish in a barrel. And Time Out Chicago is a skeleton of what it once was, so this is even more unfair.
ndgbucktown wrote: the burger at Riverview Tavern, for example, deserves to lose its credibility.
Roger Ramjet wrote:ndgbucktown wrote: the burger at Riverview Tavern, for example, deserves to lose its credibility.
Okay, but Chicago Burger Project Guy apparently didn't know about Riverview! And [e.g.] didn't get "The Bobs - a Rollercoaster of flavor"! Talk about lacking credibility.