spinynorman99 wrote:Not to add fuel to the fire, but there's a difference between a bunch of professional brewers sharing their "shop talk" and someone posting on a food-centric forum designed for the home enthusiast. I suspect your professional beermaster buddies would find a more accessible way to describe things if they were outside their group and hanging out with non-brewing friends or neighbors.
"More accessible"? It's beyond me how virtually any of the description in the original post is anything but accessible. What's difficult to understand about this language? "It will change the way you think about pecorino romano; Steven Jenkins brought us a chunk of his new proprietary cheese and it is phenomenal: quiet, then buttery, then lactic, then herbaceous..."
That section contains the single "technical" word in the entire post: "lactic." Surely that's not difficult or inaccessible. The OP follows that straightforward description with "a long sloppy kiss of a cheese"--there can't be too many folks here who don't follow that. In fact, some might even think it pretty creative and vivid language to convey his idea. It captured what he meant and I like to think I understand what he meant.
I presume it is either that phrase or the ending that has people reacting: "...then reeling back, realizing what it has done, apologizes with a finish of gratitude." The phrase may be too poetic or metaphorical for some--maybe even incomprehensible. Unusual description? You bet. Do you know what he means? I'm not certain I do, either. So what? I think I have some sense of it and even if I'm wrong, I'm grateful for what preceded it and that he took the time to call to the board's attention a cheese we might otherwise never know or even hear about. In my book, that's a pretty valuable contribution to this board.
As has already been pointed out, the poster has a particularly distinctive style. Go back and look at his posts from ten years ago and you'll find the same thing. I may not always understand Christopher Gordon's posts but I always appreciate the effort and the clear enthusiasm behind them. His style may not speak to you, but I think it's pretty intense and pithy.
Not everyone likes Faulkner, not everyone likes Hemingway. Just because one may not "get" or like a particular writer's style doesn't seem much of a reason to write him off. We all write in different ways and understand in different ways; if you don't like the writing, skip it. (Hell, if you don't like what a poster has to say on a regular basis, block them.) What baffles me is the perceived need to respond to posts you don't like or don't understand with snark (and no, I don't mean you, spinynorman99).
Gypsy Boy
"I am not a glutton--I am an explorer of food." (Erma Bombeck)