pdaane wrote:[Edit: Insert less offensive "unhip to popular culture" reference here] Atkins Nutritionals (who I assume licensed the menus) when bankrupt in July of 2005, you would not find many "Atkins Approved" dining menus anymore.
Atkins short-term results benefited from hyperbole and has been shown to be long-term harmful.
You can read more about Atkins here. Not sure about Wikipedia article, the follow links to NEJM. There is an interesting note under the criticism section, the National Weight Loss Registry indicated that of its population of registrants that have lost 70lbs and kept it off for 5 years or more, less than 1% ever went on an Atkins diet.
Did you mean South Beach Diet?
I will say that learning how simple carbohydrates and sugars effect appetite is a useful tool for anyone that has a problem with portion control...but that is about all the use I have for Atkins. I believe it was also found to be one of the most expensive diets to maintain, not including all of the Atkins licensed low-carb products.
hmm.. funny how i didn't really ask for your opinion of the diet, i asked if anyone knows of restaurants that have menus that are atkin's friendly (this being a food forum and all)...
as far as menus labeled atkins... many probably say "low carb" instead of actual atkins, but i do know they exist. If the menus had disappeared, it seems like the chain places would be the first people to ditch it, since they're more concerned with legal aspect of things than a local place would be. however, that said, if the company that "licensed" the menu (which i doubt is the case) went out of business, wouldn't that be free reign for all to not have to worry about licensing it? ...
I have a lot of friends who have successfully been doing atkins for years... its really not that hard to follow, and once you get past the induction phase (first 2 weeks), you have a lot of freedom to eat just about anything if you are conscious about it.
i agree it is expensive diet. i don't think the average american with a family can really afford to be on Atkins... to be happy with it and successful in the long term, you have to be able to afford lambchops, steaks, etc a few times a week (you could eat cheaper, but you'll quickly get bored with eating a hamburger patty every night and probably quit the diet)... but is paying $20-30 extra a week really that bad if you're able to be healthy and not overweight? i know plenty of smokers who pay more than $20 a week on <i>that</I> habit, which isn't healthy in the least.
atkins is also a complicated diet to understand... you really do need to actually read about it, and perhaps get "the book" ... i know of people who have totally stopped eating bread and pasta, and somehow thought they were on atkins. while they were cutting carbs, they weren't on any real diet. unless you do the diet right (phases, cut all carbs/alcohol at first, etc) you're going to screw your body up and make things worse..
we've both done south beach diet too... i didn't really need to lose weight but it was still interesting to be along the ride for... we quit after a few weeks.. from everything i've read now (and based off of past experience, talking to friends, etc...) it seems like south beach is harder to maintain in the long term than atkins..
as far as the long term/short term health effects... 1 of my friends who does it is a surgeon with his own surgery practice... he has said his bloodwork has drastically improved since starting... his partner's mom went on and on about how her doctor was praising how great her blood results show now, too... so for every person who said they "failed" ...you could probably find someone who was just as successful...
that said... is anyone willing to answer any suggetsions for the question? if not then let's not turn this into a debate over the diet.