Researching regional Mexican food in Chicago
In Chicago, many Mexican restaurants feature the cuisine of southwestern, Pacific-side states: Jalisco, Michoacan, Guerrero, and Oaxaca. Of course, you can find offerings from Nuevo Leon, Yucatan, etc., but I’m talking about what seem to be some predominating local trends.
There may be two primary reasons for this concentration of offerings from these four states: Chicago may attract more Mexican immigrants from this four-state area than from others, and it’s undeniably the case that there are some outstanding culinary creations from this region, which accounts for some of their popularity.
I believe one reason for the exceptional food from this region is the biodiversity of these states (as compared to more northerly states that may have a somewhat one-dimensional environment). All of these southwestern states have a coastline (so lots of access to fish), and there are mountains that tend to foster microclimates – from desert-like to lush – that favor specific crops and animals.
Another reason for the exceptional food from these states might be the fact that because they’re on the coast and were subject to early and consistent exchanges with Spain, they were and are more likely to develop interesting “fusion” dishes. Mole negro, for instance, so readily identified with Oaxaca, now contains many spices and seeds that are not native to the New World (e.g., cinnamon, sesame, among others). Spain also contributed goats, pigs and lots of other animals that become part of state-specific culinary traditions (e.g., birria in Jalisco, carnitas in Michoacan, etc.).
Yet another reason for the exceptional food from this area may be the development in pre-Industrial Mexico of relatively wealthy populations that could afford to purchase costlier ingredients. I am not referring to a general level of economic well-being, but rather to a smaller, moneyed class of people who could drive the development of – and pay for – good food. (If this were once true, it may no longer be a driver; Oaxaca and Guerrero are currently among the Mexico’s four poorest states – which might also account for heavy migration from these states. However, much Mexican wealth is concentrated in few hands, so even in impoverished states, wealthier individuals could demand higher-end chow).
A challenge with this research has been a tendency (specifically, MY tendency) to group regional foods by state. Many times a food or specific dish may have developed among native groups (e.g., Mayan, Tarascans, Mixtec), yet pre-contact tribal boundaries will not necessarily (or even usually) correspond to later divisions into states. Thus a dish like mole was developed in an early form by the Mixtec, and these people lived principally in what is now Oaxaca and Puebla, so it’s not easy to say with confidence that mole is a Oaxacan dish any more than it is a Pueblan dish.
Still, I’m looking for restaurants that might offer cuisine from some of the lesser represented states, such as Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and Tlaxcala (whose name means “Maize Corn Bread,” so I got to believe that there’s something there). If you spot unusual offerings on Chicagoland Mexican menus, I’d love to hear about them.
Hammond
Last edited by
David Hammond on February 25th, 2006, 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Don't you ever underestimate the power of a female." Bootsy Collins