Cathy2 and whomever else:
I think I was in a bit of a cranky-crankster mode last night, so I'd like to add a few words to clarify and hopefully soften my tone, which I apologize for being a bit shrill (or worse, righteous).
I do appreciate that Marilyn was completely honest about her needs and I think it's great that so many people had ideas they wanted to share and they are all using this as a "forum."
What
I prefer is when it happens sort of the other way around. For example, someone--is it MikeG?--has been on a full-blown cevapcicci bender of late and posting on every cevapcicci joint hither and yon. And sharing this mad-cap (but well informed) experience with lthforum. If I were to open The Reader or Time Out or whatever tomorrow and find his bi-line with a piece on how the greatest cevapcicci is to be found at say, Balkan on Lawrence, I would smile. And feel lucky to have been in on the research part of it.
So it's really just a style preference. I appreciate one approach more than the other but obviously, many others like contributing to the research end of it.
I wish Marilyn all the very best with her book and I'll think (and pause) a bit more before I post next time.
bjt
"eating is an agricultural act" wendell berry