That's why I wonder sometimes about how the voting is done and what constitutes "best." For example, Everest often gets tagged as the best restaurant in Chicago, and it is just so not the best. It's good, but not amazing. The food was disappointing, the sommelier was useless, some of the staff was pleasant, but others were self-important. In talking with a friend who dines at many good restaurants, it was suggested that we start a list of people who were disappointed by Everest, and yet it still gets top honors year after year. Maybe the chef cooks privately for the judges.
As for Trotter's, I do kind of get it, as he was tremendously innovative before innovation became ubiquitous. He is imaginative, fussy, and uses great ingredients. But even thinking the stuff is tasty, I see it as a "go once to say you've been" place more than an "oh my gosh can't wait to get back" place.
And of course the list begs the question "best at what?" It looks mostly like French/fusion/experimental stuff on the list. That's fun, but what about other cuisines?
That's one of the things I love about LTHForum -- the fact that there is a focus on the really great local, regional, ethnic, funky, specific, and traditional places, not just the wacky. Sure, I'll try Alinea sometime, but I go a lot more often to Ambria or Le Titi.
And I'll have to add it to my life plan to try to get to Troisgros. (I remember the days when Le Francais in Wheeling, still under the guidance of Jean Banchet, was listed as having peers only in Troisgros and Bocuse.)
So if nothing else, the list shows us that the world of the food-obsessed is growing.