annieb wrote:I believe the owners of Dharma Garden are practicing Thai Buddhists and serve the food they do because it reflects their practice, which, to them, is not "alternative."
They do serve fish, and I've had some very good fish there. I find the owners to be very pleasant people, and not in the least dogmatic.
To begin with...I'm not impugning the veracity of the cuisine(which, of course, I haven't yet investigated). There's much media surrounding the friendliness of the owners...great...good for them.
I have a kneejerk reaction when I read/hear of citizens spooging over the great seitan, fermented soybean manifestations, cod-chicken, troutcorn, ersatz-wagyu(artificial American-style fake-Kobe), and, oh my!, the vegetables! as per whatever raw, vegan, vegan/veg, ovo/lacto, piscine, raw meat, halal tank-grown striated prima materia, gelid philosopher's stone of "health"(with pleroma foam .25 surcharge)...no animals were harmed in this diatribe.
Certainly, the owners aren't dogmatic themselves(unlike a certain white uniformed brkfst place I might name)...at a certain point the food becomes unreal...reverts to a primordial aethereality...unlike, say, Southern Black diaspora soulfood steamtables where the devotion is everpresent, but so is a culinary dedication to "keepin' it real."
mmm...wheat gluten strips with miso/tamari dressing in
p-nut sauce-dressed mixed greens...yum...more brown rice, puhleeze
as opined, I'll certainly try it...but how in the world can these over-thought derivations of religious prohibitions warm the gut like a good
casein-distilled scotch and pork neck laab?
I have absolutely no interest in a sugary-sweet, tamarind-bereft tofu pad thai.
---
the above has no relevance to the actual wonderful, I'm sure, cuisine served at Chicago's hidden treasure, Dharma Garden
Being gauche rocks, stun the bourgeoisie