The chef has the goal of satisfying the guests’ palates and their demands for a great dining experience. The cooks however are motivated to prepare food only up to the standards the chef can monitor.
Ok, most of the other stuff's been covered pretty well, but I just wanted to call out this one particular comment and make sure everyone reading knows that IT'S COMPLETELY AND ABSOLUTELY WRONG.
At least as a general rule.
As someone who has spent more than a decade working as a line cook in a dozen or so restaurants, I can give firsthand testimony to this statement's inaccuracy.
The great majority of cooks take great pride in their craft and are insanely dedicated to producing great food, continuing to learn more technique, learn more about food and how to best handle it, and care very much about ensuring that what they put on plates is the best it can be in every case.
In fact, I have seen more than one cook get fired because they took issue with something the chef was telling them to do, something that they felt would impact the food quality in a negative way, whether it was using product that was a day past its prime, downgrading to a less expensive olive oil, or pushing a cook to speed up the process in order to get the food in the window.
Cooks care, dude. Most of them, at least. You don't do that job for any length of time if you don't care about the food. There are a lot easier ways to make money.
Along those lines, Forlines, I'm wondering what your food industry experience is. Where have you worked?
(as an aside, I was all set to raise my hand and volunteer to represent LTH forum at your 6/27 event, but then I realized that my wife and kids are just coming back into town that same day. I still might be able to go, but I need to check the times and coordinate.)